Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.265
Fulltext available Open Access https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLewandowski, Dirk-
dc.contributor.authorBehnert, Christiane-
dc.contributor.authorPlassmeier, Kim-
dc.contributor.authorBorst, Timo-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T15:45:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-24T15:45:32Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/12249-
dc.description.abstractWithin the research project LibRank we evaluated a sample of factors for relevance ranking in library information systems by using a test system with EconBiz data. EconBiz is an academic search portal for economics by the German National Library of Economics (ZBW - Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibnitz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft). We applied standard procedures in Information Retrieval evaluation by using human relevance assessments. The research data were obtained in three evaluation runs and are published in 3 files including: A) Search queries with descriptions; B) Document URLs with relevance assessments; C) Ranking factors and weightings.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.subject.ddc020: Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften_US
dc.titleLibRank Task Collectionsen
dc.title.alternativeLibRank - New approaches to relevance ranking in Library Information Systemsen_US
dc.typeDataseten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.48441/4427.265-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
local.researchdata.deleteaftertenyearsfalseen_US
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-reposit-134697-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Informationen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Design, Medien und Informationen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteForschungsgruppe Search Studiesen_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.7802/1253-
tuhh.type.opusDataset-
tuhh.type.rdmtrue-
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.type.casraiOther-
dc.type.diniResearchData-
dc.type.driverother-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeDataset-
datacite.relation.IsSupplementTohttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.010-
item.creatorGNDLewandowski, Dirk-
item.creatorGNDBehnert, Christiane-
item.creatorGNDPlassmeier, Kim-
item.creatorGNDBorst, Timo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypeProducts-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_ddb1-
item.creatorOrcidLewandowski, Dirk-
item.creatorOrcidBehnert, Christiane-
item.creatorOrcidPlassmeier, Kim-
item.creatorOrcidBorst, Timo-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeDataset-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Information und Medienkommunikation-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2674-9509-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Design, Medien und Information-
Appears in Collections:Research Data (with datasets)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
A_Search_queries_descriptions.xlsxA) Search queries with descriptions: This file contains 600 queries and 600 descriptions of the possible information needs. These were the queries used in all three evaluation runs. However, not every task had been fully completed by the jurors, so that there are also queries with no assessment data.62.58 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open
B_Document_URLs_relevance_assessments.xlsxB) Document URLs with relevance assessments: This file contains the assessed documents and their assessment data for all three evaluation runs. In run 1 and 2, the documents were assessed by subject specialists at the ZBW, in run 3 we recruited students of economics. In the file, we attached some notes to the columns. For a detailed description of the research design, please see the working paper accessible via the project website www.librank.info8.8 MBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open
C_Ranking_factors_weightings.xlsxC) Ranking factors and weightings: This file contains an overview of the ranking factors and the specific weightings used in all three evaluation runs. These data are in supplement to the demonstrator, which is available via the project website www.librank.info.15.92 kBMicrosoft Excel XMLView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,189
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Download(s)

246
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons