DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYagci, Nurce-
dc.contributor.authorSünkler, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorHäußler, Helena Rosalia-
dc.contributor.authorLewandowski, Dirk-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T14:30:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-15T14:30:46Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-14-
dc.identifier.issn2373-9231en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/15238-
dc.description.abstractWhen it comes to search engines, users generally prefer Google. Our study aims to find the differences between the results found in Google compared to other search engines. We compared the top 10 results from Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, and Metager, using 3,537 queries generated from Google Trends from Germany and the US. Google displays more unique domains in the top results than its competitors. Wikipedia and news websites are the most popular sources overall. With some top sources dominating search results, the distribution of domains is also consistent across all search engines. The overlap between Google and Bing is always under 32%, while Metager has a higher overlap with Bing than DuckDuckGo, going up to 78%. This study shows that the use of another search engine, especially in addition to Google, provides a wider variety in sources and might lead the user to find new perspectives.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subjectGoogleen_US
dc.subjectsearch engineen_US
dc.subjectsource comparisonen_US
dc.subjectweb scrapingen_US
dc.subjectWeb searchen_US
dc.subject.ddc020: Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaften_US
dc.titleA comparison of source distribution and result overlap in web search enginesen
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionPeerRevieweden_US
tuhh.container.endpage357en_US
tuhh.container.issue1en_US
tuhh.container.startpage346en_US
tuhh.container.volume59en_US
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Information und Medienkommunikationen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Design, Medien und Informationen_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1002/pra2.758-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
item.creatorGNDYagci, Nurce-
item.creatorGNDSünkler, Sebastian-
item.creatorGNDHäußler, Helena Rosalia-
item.creatorGNDLewandowski, Dirk-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.creatorOrcidYagci, Nurce-
item.creatorOrcidSünkler, Sebastian-
item.creatorOrcidHäußler, Helena Rosalia-
item.creatorOrcidLewandowski, Dirk-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Information und Medienkommunikation-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Information und Medienkommunikation-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Information und Medienkommunikation-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Information und Medienkommunikation-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7420-571X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2674-9509-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Design, Medien und Information-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Design, Medien und Information-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Design, Medien und Information-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Design, Medien und Information-
Appears in Collections:Publications without full text
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

360
checked on Nov 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record

Export

Items in REPOSIT are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.