Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2221
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoswag, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorRoswag, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorRoswag, Matthias Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorFietz, Joanna-
dc.contributor.authorTaefi, Tessa Touridocht-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T14:48:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-07T14:48:10Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-22-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/16873-
dc.description.abstractWith the increasing height and rotor diameter of wind turbines, bat activity monitoring within the risk area becomes more challenging. This study investigates the impact of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) on bat activity and explores acoustic bat detection via UAS as a new data collection method in the vicinity of wind turbines. We tested two types of UAS, a multicopter and a Lighter Than Air (LTA) UAS, to understand how they may affect acoustically recorded and analyzed bat activity level for three echolocation groups: Pipistrelloid, Myotini, and Nyctaloid. We hypothesized (i) that the LTA UAS will not affect bat activity levels while a multicopter, due to higher noise emission, might have a negative impact. Our results support this hypothesis, because multicopter flights have a highly significant negative impact on bat activity levels with a medium effect size, particularly for the Myotini (P < 0.001, dm = 0.54) and Nyctaloid group (P < 0.001, dn = 0.55) and a small effect size for the Pipistrelloid group (P < 0.001, dp = 0.36). In contrast, the LTA UAS had no significant effect on bat activity for each echolocation group (P > 0.05 for each group), suggesting its suitability for non-intrusive acoustic monitoring. Furthermore, we hypothesized (ii) that larger UAS propellers prevent the deterrent effect on bats. However, despite the use of larger propellers for the multicopter UAS compared to previous studies, we observed a deterrence effect for all echolocation groups. Additionally, we hypothesized that (iii) any initial deterrence or attraction effect might decrease over time. Our results did not support this hypothesis because we did not observe any habituation of bats to UAS within the 15-minute flight period. Our study highlights the potential of UAS for bat monitoring but underscores the critical importance of selecting appropriate UAS types and operating noise levels for successful surveillance effortsen
dc.description.sponsorshipBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutzen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS ONEen_US
dc.subjectBatsen_US
dc.subjectUnmanned Aerial Systemsen_US
dc.subjectDronesen_US
dc.subjectWind Energyen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_US
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftenen_US
dc.titleAdvancing bat monitoring : assessing the impact of unmanned aerial systems on bat activityen
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.48441/4427.2221-
dc.description.versionPeerRevieweden_US
local.contributorPerson.editorKhan, Zeashan Hameed-
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
tuhh.container.issue1en_US
tuhh.container.volume20en_US
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-reposit-204945-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteCompetence Center Erneuerbare Energien und Energieeffizienzen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Medientechniken_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Design, Medien und Informationen_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0314679-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.relation.projectMobile Erfassung von Fledermäusen bei On-Shore Windenergieanlagen durch autonome Messdrohnen - Teilvorhaben: FriendlyDroneen_US
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
datacite.relation.IsSupplementedBydoi:10.48441/41201.1908en_US
tuhh.container.articlenumbere0314679en_US
local.comment.externalRoswag M, Roswag A, Roswag MS, Fietz J, Taefi TT (2025) Advancing bat monitoring: Assessing the impact of unmanned aerial systems on bat activity. PLoS ONE 20(1): e0314679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314679en_US
tuhh.apc.statusfalseen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.creatorOrcidRoswag, Marc-
item.creatorOrcidRoswag, Anna-
item.creatorOrcidRoswag, Matthias Sebastian-
item.creatorOrcidFietz, Joanna-
item.creatorOrcidTaefi, Tessa Touridocht-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.creatorGNDRoswag, Marc-
item.creatorGNDRoswag, Anna-
item.creatorGNDRoswag, Matthias Sebastian-
item.creatorGNDFietz, Joanna-
item.creatorGNDTaefi, Tessa Touridocht-
crisitem.project.funderBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Medientechnik-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Medientechnik-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8391-956X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Design, Medien und Information-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Design, Medien und Information-
Appears in Collections:Publications with full text
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
RoswagTaefiEtAl_AdvancingBatMonitoring_PLOSOne.pdfPaper1.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Feb 22, 2025

Download(s)

5
checked on Feb 22, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons