Publisher DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002
Title: Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts : a health CASCADE scoping review
Language: English
Authors: McCaffrey, Lauren 
McCann, Bryan 
Giné-Garriga, Maria 
An, Qingfan 
Cardon, Greet 
Chastin, Sebastien François Martin 
Chrifou, Rabab 
Lippke, Sonia  
Loisel, Quentin 
Longworth, Giuliana Raffaella 
Messiha, Katrina 
Vogelsang, Mira 
Whyte, Emily 
Dall, Philippa Margaret 
Keywords: Co-design; Co-production; Co-creation; Experience; Scoping review
Issue Date: 23-Nov-2024
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal or Series Name: Public health 
Volume: 238
Startpage: 29
Endpage: 36
Abstract: 
Objectives This scoping review aimed to summarise available evidence relating to co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts. Understanding how participation in co-creation processes shapes experiences is important as it can offer insights into the improved development and effective use of such processes. Co-creation has increasingly gained attention due to its many claimed advantages and benefits to participants. There is however a lack of aggregated literature on stakeholders’ experience of the co-creation process.

Study design Scoping review.

Methods Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database (an open access curated database of 13,501 articles, screened for inclusion based on criteria relating to co-creation participatory research). Themes were generated through thematic analysis.

Results We included 80 publications. Positive co-creation experiences were linked to establishing interpersonal relationships and positive group dynamics, enhanced well-being, personal development, satisfaction and fulfilment. Negative experiences were associated with initial uncertainties, project-related challenges, interpersonal issues, dissatisfaction, and disengagement.

Conclusion This review offers insights into how co-creation shaped experiences and demonstrates the scope and characteristics of co-creation experiences. It highlights the need for further research, particularly in understanding the mechanisms underpinning and explaining experiences and in strategies for promoting positive experiences and mitigating negative experiences.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17388
ISSN: 1476-5616
Review status: This version was peer reviewed (peer review)
Institute: Department Gesundheitswissenschaften 
Fakultät Life Sciences 
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Publications without full text

Show full item record

Page view(s)

17
checked on Apr 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons