Publisher DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002
Title: Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts : a health CASCADE scoping review
Language: English
Authors: McCaffrey, Lauren 
McCann, Bryan 
Giné-Garriga, Maria 
An, Qingfan 
Cardon, Greet 
Chastin, Sebastien François Martin 
Chrifou, Rabab 
Lippke, Sonia  
Loisel, Quentin 
Longworth, Giuliana Raffaella 
Messiha, Katrina 
Vogelsang, Mira 
Whyte, Emily 
Dall, Philippa Margaret 
Keywords: Co-design; Co-production; Co-creation; Experience; Scoping review
Issue Date: 23-Nov-2024
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal or Series Name: Public health 
Volume: 238
Startpage: 29
Endpage: 36
Abstract: 
Objectives This scoping review aimed to summarise available evidence relating to co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts. Understanding how participation in co-creation processes shapes experiences is important as it can offer insights into the improved development and effective use of such processes. Co-creation has increasingly gained attention due to its many claimed advantages and benefits to participants. There is however a lack of aggregated literature on stakeholders’ experience of the co-creation process.

Study design Scoping review.

Methods Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for conducting scoping reviews was used. A systematic search was conducted in Scopus and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database (an open access curated database of 13,501 articles, screened for inclusion based on criteria relating to co-creation participatory research). Themes were generated through thematic analysis.

Results We included 80 publications. Positive co-creation experiences were linked to establishing interpersonal relationships and positive group dynamics, enhanced well-being, personal development, satisfaction and fulfilment. Negative experiences were associated with initial uncertainties, project-related challenges, interpersonal issues, dissatisfaction, and disengagement.

Conclusion This review offers insights into how co-creation shaped experiences and demonstrates the scope and characteristics of co-creation experiences. It highlights the need for further research, particularly in understanding the mechanisms underpinning and explaining experiences and in strategies for promoting positive experiences and mitigating negative experiences.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17388
ISSN: 1476-5616
Review status: This version was peer reviewed (peer review)
Institute: Department Gesundheitswissenschaften 
Fakultät Life Sciences 
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Publications without full text

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons