Verlagslink DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701888
Titel: Reasons given by ECEC professionals for (not) being in contact with parents during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Sprache: Englisch
Autorenschaft: Hemmerich, Fabian 
Erdem Möbius, Hande 
Burghardt, Lars  
Anders, Yvonne 
Herausgeber*In: Sørlie Street, Karin 
Schlagwörter: Kleinkinderziehung
Erscheinungsdatum: 8-Nov-2021
Verlag: Frontiers
Zeitschrift oder Schriftenreihe: Frontiers in psychology 
Zeitschriftenband: 12
Zusammenfassung: 
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the German government took drastic measures and ordered the temporary closure of early childhood education and care services (apart from emergency care). Most pedagogical professionals in early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings were unable to provide institutional care for children during this period, and thus experienced difficulties fulfilling their legally mandated professional obligation to educate children. Building on the importance of professional–parent collaboration, this study investigates the reasons ECEC professionals gave for (not) being in contact with parents during the pandemic. The database comprises a nationwide survey conducted between April and May 2020 (n = 2,560 ECEC professionals). The results show that the vast majority of respondents were in contact with parents; their stated motives include providing informational or emotional support for parents and children, maintaining a relationship, or inquiring about family wellbeing. The explanations for not being in contact with parents include already existing contact with parents by another member of the ECEC staff, an employer-mandated contact ban, problems on the parents’ side, or personal reasons. We find some differences between managers in center-based childcare, pedagogical employes in center-based childcare, and professionals in family based childcare. Practical implications concerning professional–parent collaboration and the temporary closure of ECEC services are discussed.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17516
ISSN: 1664-1078
Begutachtungsstatus: Diese Version hat ein Peer-Review-Verfahren durchlaufen (Peer Review)
Einrichtung: Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg 
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenbeitrag
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publications without full text

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenansichten

6
checked on 12.06.2025

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe

HAW Katalog

Prüfe

Volltext ergänzen

Feedback zu diesem Datensatz


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons