Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2455
Title: How to design aircraft in times of the climate crisis : are we losing our social license to operate? ; Aircraft design and the SLO
Language: English
Authors: Scholz, Dieter  
Keywords: aviation; aircraft; flight; operation; global; warming; CO2; non-CO2; emission; noise; environment; sustainability; society; community; population; local; legitimacy; credibility; trust; acceptance; social; license; culture; heritage; Airbus; A380; Hamburg; Finkenwerden; Rosengarten; Neuenfelde; farming; runway; extension; nature; river; Elbe; workplace; court; dike; law; enforcement; growth; gain; greed; guilt; Boeing; 737; design; lift; thrust; power; folding; braced; wing; optimization; fuselage; solar; configuration; glider; aerodynamics; wingspan; jet; turboprop; biplane; boxwing; blended wing body; BWB; propulsion; open rotor; CFD; flight; testing; hydrogen; LH2; e-fuel; PtL; aromatics; SAF; hydropower; windpower; carbon; cycle; Green Deal; Cascade of Obedience to the Law; Social License to Operate; SLO; Corporate Social Responsibility; CSR; Life-Cycle Assessment; LCA; Social Life-Cycle Assessment; S-LCA; Direct Operating Costs; DOC
Issue Date: 9-Apr-2025
Conference: Seminar on Commercial Development of E-Fuels in Aviation 2025 
Abstract: 
Purpose – What possibilities exist to design aircraft such that their operation is causing less global warming or even avoids it? Can this be communicated to society in a credible way to maintain or regain trust? Is the concept of the Social License to Operate (SLO) a helpful tool to manage this communication? --- Methodology – A literature review combined with a summary of own research and teaching. --- Findings – Current aviation growth is unsustainable. Flying less is necessary and a simple answer that works, but does not fulfil mobility expectations of society. A modern large turboprop (180 seats) flying slower and lower than a jet, fueled with e-fuel from renewable energy and CO2 (eventually) from Direct Air Capture (DAC), plus Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) – with its problems – to compensate for remaining non-CO2 effects would be a first meaningful step. --- Research limitations – There are no simple technical solutions for aviation.  --- Practical implications – Many arguments are given in one place.  --- Originality – A discussion of the Social License to Operate (SLO) applied to aviation, compared to Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) and aviation ethics was not found in the literature.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17541
DOI: 10.48441/4427.2455
Review status: Currently there is no review planned for this version
Institute: Forschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO) 
Department Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau 
Fakultät Technik und Informatik 
Type: Presentation
Additional note: SCHOLZ, Dieter, 2025. How to Design Aircraft in Times of the Climate Crisis – Are We Losing Our Social License to Operate? Seminar Sustainable Aviation Fuels 2025 (Bodø, Norway, 09-10 April 2025). Available from: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2455
Appears in Collections:Publications with full text

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
SCHOLZ-2025_DesignAircraft_and_the_SLO.pdf14.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

247
checked on Jun 12, 2025

Download(s)

24
checked on Jun 12, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons