Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2455
Title: How to design aircraft in times of the climate crisis : are we losing our social license to operate? ; Aircraft design and the SLO
Language: English
Authors: Scholz, Dieter  
Keywords: aviation; aircraft; flight; operation; global; warming; CO2; non-CO2; emission; noise; environment; sustainability; society; community; population; local; legitimacy; credibility; trust; acceptance; social; license; culture; heritage; Airbus; A380; Hamburg; Finkenwerden; Rosengarten; Neuenfelde; farming; runway; extension; nature; river; Elbe; workplace; court; dike; law; enforcement; growth; gain; greed; guilt; Boeing; 737; design; lift; thrust; power; folding; braced; wing; optimization; fuselage; solar; configuration; glider; aerodynamics; wingspan; jet; turboprop; biplane; boxwing; blended wing body; BWB; propulsion; open rotor; CFD; flight; testing; hydrogen; LH2; e-fuel; PtL; aromatics; SAF; hydropower; windpower; carbon; cycle; Green Deal; Cascade of Obedience to the Law; Social License to Operate; SLO; Corporate Social Responsibility; CSR; Life-Cycle Assessment; LCA; Social Life-Cycle Assessment; S-LCA; Direct Operating Costs; DOC
Issue Date: 9-Apr-2025
Conference: Seminar on Commercial Development of E-Fuels in Aviation 2025 
Abstract: 
Purpose – What possibilities exist to design aircraft such that their operation is causing less global warming or even avoids it? Can this be communicated to society in a credible way to maintain or regain trust? Is the concept of the Social License to Operate (SLO) a helpful tool to manage this communication? --- Methodology – A literature review combined with a summary of own research and teaching. --- Findings – Current aviation growth is unsustainable. Flying less is necessary and a simple answer that works, but does not fulfil mobility expectations of society. A modern large turboprop (180 seats) flying slower and lower than a jet, fueled with e-fuel from renewable energy and CO2 (eventually) from Direct Air Capture (DAC), plus Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) – with its problems – to compensate for remaining non-CO2 effects would be a first meaningful step. --- Research limitations – There are no simple technical solutions for aviation.  --- Practical implications – Many arguments are given in one place.  --- Originality – A discussion of the Social License to Operate (SLO) applied to aviation, compared to Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) and aviation ethics was not found in the literature.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17541
DOI: 10.48441/4427.2455
Review status: Currently there is no review planned for this version
Institute: Forschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO) 
Department Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau 
Fakultät Technik und Informatik 
Type: Presentation
Additional note: SCHOLZ, Dieter, 2025. How to Design Aircraft in Times of the Climate Crisis – Are We Losing Our Social License to Operate? Seminar Sustainable Aviation Fuels 2025 (Bodø, Norway, 09-10 April 2025). Available from: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2455
Appears in Collections:Publications with full text

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
SCHOLZ-2025_DesignAircraft_and_the_SLO.pdf14.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons