Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2491
Fulltext available Open Access
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNiţă, Mihaela-
dc.contributor.authorScholz, Dieter-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-16T17:03:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-16T17:03:23Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-30-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17607-
dc.description.abstractThis Technical Note investigates the business case "completion center" from a financial point of view. First, a theoretical background is presented, regarding how to estimate chances and risks of a business plan, how to schedule cash flow or how to estimate capital investments. Second, an EXCEL based tool is created, which is foreseen as a management tool for evaluating strategic scenarios towards the vision "completion center". The tool evaluates three types of projects – small, medium, complex – over a period of five years, from 2011 to 2015. Input data for conducting this evaluation are parameters describing the project, on the one hand, such as project type, project duration, personnel required, training intensity, etc. and parameters describing the background of the project, on the other hand, such as monthly costs for staff, costs required for sales or miscellaneous costs, amount of external personnel or experts, etc. Each project evaluation delivers the cash flow, the profit and the profit-turnover ratio. A summary of output data presents the cumulative cash flow, total costs, personnel required, gain after 5 years, minimum investment and Return on Investment for the whole defined scenario. Changes applied to input data reflect automatically on the calculations. An initial Project Zero covers the initial expenses required to set up the completion center to the capability of starting independent projects. With the default input three scenarios are evaluated: 1.) small investments, small number of projects; 2.) medium investments, small number of projects; 3.) large investment, large number of projects. The results show that an initial solid investment delivers higher profits, while starting with small projects one after the other provides more safety but also less gain. However these results may not be accurate enough due to the lack of precision in estimating the project values. Engineering experience is required to create feasible scenarios.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectaviationen_US
dc.subjectaircraften_US
dc.subjectcabinen_US
dc.subjectsystemen_US
dc.subjectcompletionen_US
dc.subjectupgradeen_US
dc.subjectconversionen_US
dc.subjectrefurbishingen_US
dc.subjectoptimizationen_US
dc.subjectprocessen_US
dc.subjectchainen_US
dc.subjectretrofiten_US
dc.subjectmanufactureren_US
dc.subjectprocedureen_US
dc.subjectcompletion centeren_US
dc.subjectinvestmenten_US
dc.subjecttoolen_US
dc.subjectExcelen_US
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectexpenditureen_US
dc.subjectturnoveren_US
dc.subjectcostsen_US
dc.subjectgainen_US
dc.subjectcash flowen_US
dc.subjectrate of returnen_US
dc.subjectrisken_US
dc.subjectsafetyen_US
dc.subjectpersonnelen_US
dc.subjecttrainingen_US
dc.subjectengineeringen_US
dc.subjectexperienceen_US
dc.subjectscenarioen_US
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftenen_US
dc.titleCARISMA: Aircraft Cabin and Cabin Systems Refurbishing, Optimization of Technical Processes – planning of a business case for a completion centeren
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.48441/4427.2491-
dc.description.versionNonPeerRevieweden_US
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-reposit-212525-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteForschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO)en_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbauen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Technik und Informatiken_US
tuhh.publisher.urlhttps://purl.org/carisma/WP5_TN-
tuhh.publisher.urlhttp://carisma.ProfScholz.de-
tuhh.type.opusReport-
tuhh.type.rdmtrue-
dc.type.casraiOther-
dc.type.diniOther-
dc.type.driverother-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
datacite.relation.IsSupplementedBydoi:10.7910/DVN/0WF0BWen_US
local.comment.externalNITA, Mihaela, SCHOLZ, Dieter, 2010. CARISMA: Aircraft Cabin and Cabin Systems Refurbishing, Optimization of Technical Processes – Planning of a Business Case for a Completion Center. Report: CARISMA_WP5_TN_2010-09-30. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (HAW Hamburg). Available from: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2491en_US
tuhh.apc.statusfalseen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeReport-
item.creatorOrcidNiţă, Mihaela-
item.creatorOrcidScholz, Dieter-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.creatorGNDNiţă, Mihaela-
item.creatorGNDScholz, Dieter-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8188-7269-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Technik und Informatik-
Appears in Collections:Publications with full text
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
CARISMA_WP5_TN_10-09-30.pdf3.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


Items in REPOSIT are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.