DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorScholz, Dieter-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigo, Clinton-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-10T08:09:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-10T08:09:21Z-
dc.date.created2019-09-22-
dc.date.issued2025-06-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17732-
dc.description.abstractPurpose - This thesis presents a comparison of aircraft design concepts to identify the superior propulsion system model among turbo-hydraulic, turbo-electric and classic jet propulsion with respect to Direct Operating Costs (DOC), environmental impact and fuel burn. --- Approach - A simple aircraft model was designed based on the Top-Level Aircraft Requirements of the Airbus A320 passenger aircraft, and novel engine concepts were integrated to establish new models. Numerous types of propulsion system configurations were created by varying the type of gas turbine engine and number of propulsors. --- Findings - After an elaborate comparison of the aforementioned concepts, the all turbo-hydraulic propulsion system is found to be superior to the all turbo-electric propulsion system. A new propulsion system concept was developed by combining the thrust of a turbofan engine and utilizing the power produced by the turbo-hydraulic propulsion system that is delivered via propellers. The new partial turbo-hydraulic propulsion concept in which 20% of the total cruise power is coming from the (hydraulic driven) propellers is even more efficient than an all turbo-hydraulic concept in terms of DOC, environmental impact and fuel burn. --- Research Limitations - The aircraft were modelled with a spreadsheet based on handbook methods and relevant statistics. The investigation was done only for one type of reference aircraft and one route. A detailed analysis with a greater number of reference aircraft and types of routes could lead to other results. --- Practical Implications - With the provided spreadsheet, the DOC and environmental impact can be approximated for any commercial reference aircraft combined with the aforementioned propulsion system concepts. --- Social Implications - Based on the results of this thesis, the public will be able to discuss the demerits of otherwise highly lauded electric propulsion concepts. --- Value - To evaluate the viability of the hydraulic propulsion systems for passenger aircraft using simple mass models and aircraft design concept.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectaeronauticsen_US
dc.subjectairplanesen_US
dc.subjectaircraften_US
dc.subjectperformanceen_US
dc.subjectcostsen_US
dc.subjectaccountingen_US
dc.subjectaeroplaneen_US
dc.subjectdesignen_US
dc.subjectjeten_US
dc.subjecttransporten_US
dc.subjectpropulsionen_US
dc.subjectturbofanen_US
dc.subjectengineen_US
dc.subjectelectricen_US
dc.subjecthydraulicen_US
dc.subjectdistributeden_US
dc.subjectAirbusen_US
dc.subjectA320en_US
dc.subjectfuelen_US
dc.subjectconsumptionen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjectprotectionen_US
dc.subjectelectronicen_US
dc.subjectspreadsheeten_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectflighten_US
dc.subjectmechanicsen_US
dc.subjectcertificationen_US
dc.subjectDOCen_US
dc.subjectDirect Operating Costsen_US
dc.subjectLuftfahrten_US
dc.subjectLuftfahrzeugen_US
dc.subjectFlugmechaniken_US
dc.subjectBetriebskostenen_US
dc.subjectÖlhydrauliken_US
dc.subjectFlugtriebwerken_US
dc.subjectElektroantrieben_US
dc.subjectKraftstoffverbrauchen_US
dc.subjectFlugzeugen_US
dc.subjectEntwurfen_US
dc.subjectDimensionierungen_US
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftenen_US
dc.titleBasic comparison of three aircraft concepts : classic jet propulsion, turbo-electric propulsion and turbo-hydraulic propulsionen
dc.typeThesisen_US
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
thesis.grantor.departmentDepartment Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbauen_US
thesis.grantor.departmentFakultät Technik und Informatiken_US
thesis.grantor.universityOrInstitutionFachhochschule Wiener Neustadten_US
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-reposit-213662-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteForschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO)en_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbauen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Technik und Informatiken_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.15488/9329-
tuhh.publisher.urlhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-aero2019-09-22.014-
tuhh.publisher.urlhttps://n2t.net/ark:/13960/t2k72zp1t-
tuhh.type.opusMasterarbeit-
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.type.casraiSupervised Student Publication-
dc.type.dinimasterThesis-
dc.type.drivermasterThesis-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dc.type.thesismasterThesisen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
datacite.relation.IsSupplementedBydoi:10.7910/DVN/K5FLHRen_US
tuhh.dnb.statusfreeen_US
item.creatorGNDRodrigo, Clinton-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.advisorGNDScholz, Dieter-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.creatorOrcidRodrigo, Clinton-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
TextRodrigo.pdf3.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons