DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorScholz, Dieter-
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Diego-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-23T12:14:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-23T12:14:10Z-
dc.date.created2021-12-06-
dc.date.issued2025-06-23-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17763-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – Assessment of the Direct Operating Costs (DOC) and fuel consumption of the Airbus A321LR using typical use-cases and comparison with those from similar aircraft. Investigation of the flexibility of the cabin layout using examples from different airlines. Calculation of Ecolabels based on different cabin configurations. --- Methodology – All aircraft-related data is retrieved from the Original Equipment Manufacturers' (OEM) manuals. The DOC assessment uses the Association of European Airlines (AEA) and the TU Berlin method. The fuel consumption is assessed with a tool based on the Breguet Range equation, using successive iterations. The Ecolabel considers resource depletion, global warming, local air quality, and noise pollution, weighted and combined into one overall rating. A cabin study contrast layouts from Airbus with those from operators and also considering ergonomics. --- Findings – The A321LR offers improvements in flight range compared to A321CEO and A321NEO. It can operate medium range very efficiently with only minor payload reduction. Very low-density layouts of a few airlines are purely their marketing preferences. Costs per seat and Ecolabel rating vary significantly between low-density and high-density cabin configurations. Predictions for the A321XLR are also very favorable. --- Research Limitations – DOC results are not unique numbers but depend on the DOC method applied. Some of the characteristics for the XLR can so far only be estimated, since its entry into service is scheduled for 2023 and, as such, after the submission of this thesis. --- Practical Implications – Good reasons for operating the A321LR are elaborated. The Ecolabel allows passengers and operators to openly discuss the ecological implications of different cabin layouts. --- Originality – This seems to be the first scientific report that extensively investigates economic and ecologic aspects when operating the A321LR with different cabin layouts.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectLuftfahrten_US
dc.subjectPassagierflugzeugen_US
dc.subjectAirbusen_US
dc.subjectAirbus 320en_US
dc.subjectLuftfahrzeugen_US
dc.subjectKraftstoffverbrauchen_US
dc.subjectLuftverschmutzungen_US
dc.subjectEmissionen_US
dc.subjectAbgasemissionen_US
dc.subjectKohlendioxidemissionen_US
dc.subjectStickstoffoxideen_US
dc.subjectKondensstreifenen_US
dc.subjectUmweltbilanzen_US
dc.subjectÖkolabelen_US
dc.subjectFlugzeugkabineen_US
dc.subjectBetriebskostenen_US
dc.subjectKraftstofftanken_US
dc.subjectCO2en_US
dc.subjectNOXen_US
dc.subjectReichweiteen_US
dc.subjectLangstreckeen_US
dc.subjectaeronauticsen_US
dc.subjectairplanesen_US
dc.subjectaircraften_US
dc.subjectfuelen_US
dc.subjectconsumptionen_US
dc.subjectproducten_US
dc.subjectlife cycleen_US
dc.subjectenvironmenten_US
dc.subjectairen_US
dc.subjectpollutionen_US
dc.subjectglobal warmingen_US
dc.subjectclimatic changesen_US
dc.subjectcarbon dioxideen_US
dc.subjectnitrogen oxidesen_US
dc.subjectcabinsen_US
dc.subjectcost of operationen_US
dc.subjectfuel tanksen_US
dc.subjectrangeen_US
dc.subjectlong-rangeen_US
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftenen_US
dc.titleDirect operating Costs, fuel consumption, and layout of the Airbus A321LRen
dc.typeThesisen_US
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
thesis.grantor.departmentDepartment Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbauen_US
thesis.grantor.departmentFakultät Technik und Informatiken_US
thesis.grantor.universityOrInstitutionHochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburgen_US
tuhh.contributor.refereeKonieczny, Gordon-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-reposit-214049-
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteForschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO)en_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbauen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Technik und Informatiken_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.15488/19167-
tuhh.publisher.urlhttps://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-aero2021-12-06.014-
tuhh.publisher.urlhttps://n2t.net/ark:/13960/s221t8xjnwg-
tuhh.type.opusBachelor Thesis-
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.type.casraiSupervised Student Publication-
dc.type.dinibachelorThesis-
dc.type.driverbachelorThesis-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dc.type.thesisbachelorThesisen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
datacite.relation.IsSupplementedBydoi:10.7910/DVN/0QHDMEen_US
tuhh.dnb.statusfreeen_US
item.creatorGNDFonseca, Diego-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.advisorGNDScholz, Dieter-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.creatorOrcidFonseca, Diego-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
TextFonseca.pdf7.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

45
checked on Jul 30, 2025

Download(s)

37
checked on Jul 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons