Calibration of a Quartz Tuning Fork as a sound detector

Abstract

This study compares the performance of a quartz tuning fork (QTF) with a highly sensitive ultrasound microphone in the context of acoustic measurements, applying the substitution calibration method. QTF sensors are increasingly used for high-precision tasks due to their sensitivity and stability, while microphones are still the standard in general acoustic measurements. The aim of this study is to evaluate both technologies across several key performance metrics, including linearity of response, sensitivity, noise characteristics, and acoustic detection limit. Which sensor is better suited to which acoustic and physical condition? The results show that QTFs perform exceptionally well in applications requiring high precision, especially in high-frequency and narrow-band measurements. The signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) of the QTF at its resonance frequency is 14 dB higher than that of the microphone, whereas the detection limit and linearity are comparable. The findings suggest that QTF sensors are particularly advantageous for specialized applications like photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS).