Verlagslink: https://www.fzt.haw-hamburg.de/pers/Scholz/paper/SCHOLZ_PUB_DLRK2005_Mach_Number_Wing_Relative_Thickness_2005-09-26.pdf
Titel: Mach number, relative thickness, sweep and lift coefficient of the wing : an empirical investigation of parameters and equations
Sprache: Englisch
Autorenschaft: Scholz, Dieter  
Ciornei, Simona 
Schlagwörter: aviation; aeronautics; airplane; aeroplane; aircraft; design; aerodynamics; wing; Mach number; relative; thickness; sweep; lift; coefficient; wing; statistics; equations; parameters; optimization; Standard Error of Estimate; SEE; Excel; database
Erscheinungsdatum: 2005
Verlag: DGLR
Teil der Schriftenreihe: Jahrbuch... der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt - Lilienthal-Oberth (DGLR) 
Bandangabe: 2005,1
Wird ergänzt von: 10.7910/DVN/QLETGG
Konferenz: Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2005 
Zusammenfassung: 
12 equations were investigated to calculate the relative thickness, t/c of the wing of an aircraft. The calculated relative thickness was taken as the average relative thickness of the wing. The data obtained from these 12 equations was checked against the given average relative thickness of 29 carefully selected aircraft, spanning a space of the parameters Mach number, lift coefficient, sweep, and type of airfoil. Some equations selected are empirical in their nature (partly based on aerodynamic derivation) other equations are purely statistical. Whenever equations had free parameters, these were optimized against the aircraft data. The best equation turned out to be an equation based on nonlinear regression. It achieved a Standard Error of Estimate of only 0.75% for the average relative thickness of the wing. TORENBEEK’s equation will probably be preferred by those who like to see an equation that is based on aerodynamic considerations. It achieved a Standard Error of Estimate of 0.80% when all its free parameters were considered for optimization. The worst equation produced an Standard Error of Estimate of 8%. For an airfoil with 10% relative thickness this would give an unacceptable 10% ± 8% mean band of values for t/c. This shows that it is necessary to carefully select a suitable equation among the many equations and methods available. Some equations seem not to provide useful results.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/18088
DOI: 10.48441/4427.2782
ISSN: 0070-4083
Ausgabe / Version: CD-ROM
Begutachtungsstatus: Für diese Version ist aktuell keine Begutachtung geplant
Einrichtung: Forschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO) 
Department Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau 
Fakultät Technik und Informatik 
Dokumenttyp: Konferenzveröffentlichung
Hinweise zur Quelle: SCHOLZ, Dieter, CIORNEI, Simona, 2005. Mach Number, Relative Thickness, Sweep and Lift Coefficient of the Wing – An Empirical Investigation of Parameters and Equations. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress (Friedrichshafen, 26. - 29. September 2005). In: BRANDT, Peter (Ed.). Jahrbuch 2005. Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DGLR). Paper: DGLR-2005-122, ISSN 0070-4083. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2782
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publications with full text

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Zur Langanzeige

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe

HAW Katalog

Prüfe

Feedback zu diesem Datensatz


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons