Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2782
Publisher URL: https://www.fzt.haw-hamburg.de/pers/Scholz/paper/SCHOLZ_PUB_DLRK2005_Mach_Number_Wing_Relative_Thickness_2005-09-26.pdf
Title: Mach number, relative thickness, sweep and lift coefficient of the wing : an empirical investigation of parameters and equations
Language: English
Authors: Scholz, Dieter  
Ciornei, Simona 
Keywords: aviation; aeronautics; airplane; aeroplane; aircraft; design; aerodynamics; wing; Mach number; relative; thickness; sweep; lift; coefficient; wing; statistics; equations; parameters; optimization; Standard Error of Estimate; SEE; Excel; database
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: DGLR
Part of Series: Jahrbuch... der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt - Lilienthal-Oberth (DGLR) 
Volume number: 2005,1
Is supplemented by: 10.7910/DVN/QLETGG
Conference: Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2005 
Abstract: 
12 equations were investigated to calculate the relative thickness, t/c of the wing of an aircraft. The calculated relative thickness was taken as the average relative thickness of the wing. The data obtained from these 12 equations was checked against the given average relative thickness of 29 carefully selected aircraft, spanning a space of the parameters Mach number, lift coefficient, sweep, and type of airfoil. Some equations selected are empirical in their nature (partly based on aerodynamic derivation) other equations are purely statistical. Whenever equations had free parameters, these were optimized against the aircraft data. The best equation turned out to be an equation based on nonlinear regression. It achieved a Standard Error of Estimate of only 0.75% for the average relative thickness of the wing. TORENBEEK’s equation will probably be preferred by those who like to see an equation that is based on aerodynamic considerations. It achieved a Standard Error of Estimate of 0.80% when all its free parameters were considered for optimization. The worst equation produced an Standard Error of Estimate of 8%. For an airfoil with 10% relative thickness this would give an unacceptable 10% ± 8% mean band of values for t/c. This shows that it is necessary to carefully select a suitable equation among the many equations and methods available. Some equations seem not to provide useful results.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/18088
DOI: 10.48441/4427.2782
ISSN: 0070-4083
Edition / version: CD-ROM
Review status: Currently there is no review planned for this version
Institute: Forschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO) 
Department Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau 
Fakultät Technik und Informatik 
Type: Chapter/Article (Proceedings)
Additional note: SCHOLZ, Dieter, CIORNEI, Simona, 2005. Mach Number, Relative Thickness, Sweep and Lift Coefficient of the Wing – An Empirical Investigation of Parameters and Equations. Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress (Friedrichshafen, 26. - 29. September 2005). In: BRANDT, Peter (Ed.). Jahrbuch 2005. Bonn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DGLR). Paper: DGLR-2005-122, ISSN 0070-4083. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2782
Appears in Collections:Publications with full text

Files in This Item:
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons