Publisher DOI: 10.1186/s41687-025-00925-x
Title: Development of the QoLISSY 0–4 questionnaire : a health-related quality of life tool for young children with short stature
Language: English
Authors: Adedeji, Adekunle  
Witt, Stefanie 
Quitmann, Julia  
Keywords: Cognitive debriefing; Early childhood health; Health-related quality of life (HRQoL); Pediatric assessment; PROMs; QOLISSY; Questionnaire development; Short stature
Issue Date: 25-Jul-2025
Publisher: Springer
Journal or Series Name: Journal of patient-reported outcomes 
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Abstract: 
Short stature in children aged 0–4 years presents unique physical, social, and emotional challenges that significantly impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The QoLISSY 0–4 questionnaire was developed as a Patient Reported Outcome measure (PROMS) to address the absence of an age-specific, condition-focused HRQoL assessment tool for this population. A mixed-method approach was employed to adapt the original QoLISSY questionnaire for children aged 5–18. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 parents of children diagnosed with short-stature conditions, including achondroplasia, small for gestational age, growth hormone deficiency, and Silver-Russell Syndrome. Cognitive debriefing sessions and iterative feedback guided the development of new items tailored to the needs of children aged 0–4. Pilot testing involved 20 parents, who evaluated the questionnaire’s clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness. The development process yielded an 8-domain, 55-item questionnaire addressing physical health, social interactions, emotions, coping mechanisms, medical care, future concerns, and parental impact. Cognitive debriefing results indicated high item clarity (100%), relevance (93%), and importance (94%), with parents confirming that the questionnaire effectively captured their child’s HRQoL experiences. The QoLISSY 0–4 questionnaire provides a tailored, parent-reported tool for assessing HRQoL in children aged 0–4 with short stature. Its development reflects a rigorous, participant-informed process ensuring its relevance and usability. Future validation studies will explore its cross-cultural applicability and psychometric properties to establish its utility in research and clinical settings.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/18145
ISSN: 2509-8020
Review status: This version was peer reviewed (peer review)
Institute: Department Soziale Arbeit 
Fakultät Wirtschaft und Soziales 
Type: Article
Additional note: article number: 95 (2025)
Appears in Collections:Publications without full text

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons