DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorLeal Filho, Walter-
dc.contributor.authorZgrzywa-Ziemak, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorCyrek, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorAzadi, Hossein-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-17T10:08:33Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-17T10:08:33Z-
dc.date.issued2025-12-02-
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su172310800-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/19081-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to identify the trending topics of sustainability communication and to empirically verify them (in terms of the content and extent) in sustainability reports of multinational corporations (MNCs), utilizing the introduced analytical framework. A systematic literature review identified eleven key themes that currently shape the discourse on sustainability communication. An empirical study of 10 multinational companies across five industries was conducted using an analytical framework developed by the authors. This framework assessed the significance of identified themes (measured by exposure) and the comprehensiveness of approaches to each theme (goal–action–measure–progress, GAMP). The findings indicate that some aspects of sustainability communication are inconsistently addressed by these MNCs, and a few aspects are being reported comprehensively. The analysis revealed that climate-related themes and circular economy are communicated most comprehensively across all companies, while engagement with the SDGs, multi-stakeholder partnerships, and sustainable value creation shows the lowest levels of goal-setting, measurement, and time-based progress disclosure. Materiality assessments are the only theme reported consistently across all four GAMP components. When comparing reporting patterns with sustainability paradigms, no MNC demonstrates a holistic approach, and most show a clear inclination toward win–win or instrumental orientations. The study extends existing models of sustainability reporting by providing a replicable analytical framework bridging descriptive and evaluative approaches. Practical and policy implications are outlined for both corporations and regulators aiming to enhance reporting alignment with EU standards such as CSRD and ESRS.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectsustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectcommunicationen_US
dc.subjectcompetitivenessen_US
dc.subjectcase studiesen_US
dc.subjectESG reportingen_US
dc.subject.ddc370: Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesenen_US
dc.titleTrending topics in sustainability communication: revealing the gap between theoretical insights and reporting practiceen
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionPeerRevieweden_US
tuhh.container.issue23en_US
tuhh.container.volume17en_US
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteCompetence Center Gesundheiten_US
tuhh.publication.instituteForschungs- und Transferzentrum Nachhaltigkeit und Klimafolgenmanagementen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Gesundheiten_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.3390/su172310800-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.rights.cchttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
local.comment.externalarticle number: 10800en_US
item.creatorOrcidLeal Filho, Walter-
item.creatorOrcidZgrzywa-Ziemak, Anna-
item.creatorOrcidCyrek, Barbara-
item.creatorOrcidAzadi, Hossein-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.creatorGNDLeal Filho, Walter-
item.creatorGNDZgrzywa-Ziemak, Anna-
item.creatorGNDCyrek, Barbara-
item.creatorGNDAzadi, Hossein-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Gesundheitswissenschaften (ehemalig, aufgelöst 10.2025)-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1241-5225-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Life Sciences (ehemalig, aufgelöst 10.2025)-
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publications without full text
Zur Kurzanzeige

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe

HAW Katalog

Prüfe

Volltext ergänzen

Feedback zu diesem Datensatz


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons