Publisher DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14476-z
Title: Attitudes of European students towards family decision-making and the harmonisation of consent systems in deceased organ donation : a cross-national survey
Language: English
Authors: Molina-Pérez, Alberto 
Werner-Felmayer, Gabriele 
Van Assche, Kristof 
Jensen, Anja M. B. 
Delgado, Janet 
Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena 
Hannikainen, Ivar R. 
Rodríguez-Arias, David 
Schicktanz, Silke 
Wöhlke, Sabine 
Keywords: Consent; Family involvement; Organ donation; Policy harmonisation; Survey
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal or Series Name: BMC public health 
Volume: 22
Issue: 1
Abstract: 
Background: European countries are increasingly harmonising their organ donation and transplantation policies. Although a growing number of nations are moving to presumed consent to deceased organ donation, no attempts have been made to harmonise policies on individual consent and the role of the family in the decision-making process. Little is known about public awareness of and attitudes towards the role of the family in their own country and European harmonisation on these health policy dimensions. To improve understanding of these issues, we examined what university students think about the role of the family in decision-making in deceased organ donation and about harmonising consent policies within Europe. Methods: Using LimeSurvey© software, we conducted a comparative cross-sectional international survey of 2193 university students of health sciences and humanities/social sciences from Austria (339), Belgium (439), Denmark (230), Germany (424), Greece (159), Romania (190), Slovenia (190), and Spain (222). Results: Participants from opt-in countries may have a better awareness of the family’s legal role than those from opt-out countries. Most respondents opposed the family veto, but they were more ambivalent towards the role of the family as a surrogate decision-maker. The majority of participants were satisfied with the family’s legal role. However, those who were unsatisfied preferred to limit family involvement. Overall, participants were opposed to the idea of national sovereignty over consent policies. They favoured an opt-out policy harmonisation and were divided over opt-in. Their views on harmonisation of family involvement were consistent with their personal preferences. Conclusions: There is overall division on whether families should have a surrogate role, and substantial opposition to granting them sole authority over decision-making. If European countries were to harmonise their policies on consent for organ donation, an opt-out system that grants families a surrogate decision-making role may enjoy the widest public support.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/19627
ISSN: 1471-2458
Review status: This version was peer reviewed (peer review)
Institute: Department Gesundheitswissenschaften (ehemalig, aufgelöst 10.2025) 
Fakultät Life Sciences (ehemalig, aufgelöst 10.2025) 
Type: Article
Additional note: article number: 2080 (2022)
Appears in Collections:Publications without full text

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons