Verlagslink DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.031
Titel: Shared decision-making in physical therapy: a cross-sectional study on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use
Autorenschaft: Topp, Janine 
Westenhöfer, Joachim  
Scholl, Isabelle 
Hahlweg, Pola 
Erscheinungsdatum: Feb-2018
Zeitschrift oder Schriftenreihe: Patient education and counseling 
Zeitschriftenband: 10
Anfangsseite: 346
Endseite: 351
Zusammenfassung: 
Objective: This study aimed a) to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of shared decision-making (SDM) among physiotherapists in Germany, b) to explore their association with demographic characteristics, and c) to assess barriers to the implementation of SDM. Methods: We assessed above mentioned domains using an online survey. Two-level logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use of SDM. Results: 60.5% of a total sample of 357 participants reported to have had no knowledge on SDM before participating in the survey. Attitudes towards SDM were mostly positive, half of all participants expressed a preference for SDM. About two thirds of all participants reported to use a rather paternalistic approach in routine care. Knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of SDM were associated with several demographic characteristics. Conclusion: SDM was perceived as an appropriate concept in physiotherapy. However, missing knowledge and limited self-reported use of SDM in routine care on the one hand and positive attitudes towards SDM on the other hand indicate a need for action. Practice implications: In order to emphasize the use of SDM in physiotherapy efforts need to be undertaken in research, clinical practice and health policy.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/4200
ISSN: 1873-5134
Einrichtung: Department Gesundheitswissenschaften 
Fakultät Life Sciences 
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenbeitrag
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publications without full text

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenansichten

124
checked on 03.04.2025

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe

HAW Katalog

Prüfe

Volltext ergänzen

Feedback zu diesem Datensatz


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.