DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeal Filho, Walter-
dc.contributor.authorModesto, Francine-
dc.contributor.authorNagy, Gustavo J.-
dc.contributor.authorSaroar, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorToamukum, Nsani Yannik-
dc.contributor.authorHa´apio, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T15:38:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-02T15:38:44Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-22-
dc.identifier.issn1573-1596en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/4584-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes a comparative study of four different cases on vulnerability, hazards and adaptive capacity to climate threats in coastal areas and communities in four developing countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon and Uruguay. Coastal areas are vulnerable to sea-level rise (SLR), storm surges and flooding due to their (i) exposure, (ii) concentration of settlements, many of which occupied by less advantaged groups and (iii) the concentration of assets and services seen in these areas. The objective of the paper is twofold: (i) to evaluate current evidence of coastal vulnerability and adaptive capacity and (ii) to compare adaptation strategies being implemented in a sample of developing countries, focusing on successful ones. The followed approach for the case evaluation is based on (i) documenting observed threats and damages, (ii) using indicators of physical and socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptive capacity status and (iii) selecting examples of successful responses. Major conclusions based on cross-case comparison are (a) the studied countries show different vulnerability, adaptive capacity and implementation of responses, (b) innovative community-based (CBA) and ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) and (c) early warning systems are key approaches and tools to foster climate resilience. A recommendation to foster the resilience of coastal communities and services is that efforts in innovative adaptation strategies to sea-level rise should be intensified and integrated with climate risk management within the national adaption plans (NAPAs) in order to reduce the impacts of hazards.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMitigation and adaptation strategies for global changeen_US
dc.titleFostering coastal resilience to climate change vulnerability in Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon and Uruguay: a cross-country comparisonen
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionPeerRevieweden_US
openaire.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cben_US
tuhh.container.endpage602en_US
tuhh.container.startpage579en_US
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Gesundheitswissenschaftenen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Life Sciencesen_US
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1007/s11027-017-9750-3-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen_US
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
item.creatorGNDLeal Filho, Walter-
item.creatorGNDModesto, Francine-
item.creatorGNDNagy, Gustavo J.-
item.creatorGNDSaroar, Mustafa-
item.creatorGNDToamukum, Nsani Yannik-
item.creatorGNDHa´apio, Michael-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.creatorOrcidLeal Filho, Walter-
item.creatorOrcidModesto, Francine-
item.creatorOrcidNagy, Gustavo J.-
item.creatorOrcidSaroar, Mustafa-
item.creatorOrcidToamukum, Nsani Yannik-
item.creatorOrcidHa´apio, Michael-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Gesundheitswissenschaften-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1241-5225-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Life Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Publications without full text
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record


Items in REPOSIT are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.