DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorStueve, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorZöllner, York
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T15:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-02T15:39:54Z-
dc.date.issued2018-7
dc.identifier.issn0012-1797
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/4815-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) uses capillary blood glucose to measure glycemia in diabetic patients. Recently FDA-approved Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring (F-CGM) reveals glucose levels when scanned by the reading device. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have announced to reimburse F-CGM at the same level as CGM devices. Aim: This analysis’ objective was to quantify the CMS budget impact (BI) of F-CGM reimbursement in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on intensified insulin therapy (IIT), and compare it to the BI of conventional SMBG via cost-related break-even metrics. These were chosen because - in the absence of RCT-based, primary endpoint-driven clinical superiority evidence of F-CGM over SMBG for this population (REPLACE study) - they are well-suited to inform budget allocation decisions. Methods: An economic model was developed in Excel. CMS reimbursement/patient co-insurance levels for SMBG and F-CGM were used; data on morbidity, treatment and usage patterns were sourced from the literature and official websites. Different scenarios were simulated to elicit break-even points between F-CGM and SMBG. Results: The annual cost of SMBG with 3.7 tests per day (see REPLACE) is $180 per patient, compared to $2,156 incurred per F-CGM patient, representing a cost difference of $1,976/year or $5.41/day. This implies a budget break-even ratio of 1:12 patients (F-CGM:SMBG). Both technologies would break even at a consumption of 44 test strips per day. A year’s SMBG budget would last only 30 days if spent on F-CGM. Conclusion: With diabetes budgets under pressure, thoughtful spending policies are needed. It is recommended to analyze in detail which T2DM subgroups will benefit most from F-CGM, focusing reimbursement to the latter. SMBG, being an established technology, represents - at current reimbursement levels - an attractive spending option to budget holders.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetes : the journal of the American Diabetes Association
dc.titleBudget Impact Analysis of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose vs. Flash-Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Intensive Insulin Users with Diabetes Type 2 Covered by Medicare and Medicaid
dc.typeArticle
tuhh.container.endpageLB
tuhh.container.issueSuppl. 1
tuhh.container.startpage142
tuhh.container.volume67
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Gesundheitswissenschaften
tuhh.publication.instituteFakultät Life Sciences
tuhh.publisher.doi10.2337/db18-142-LB-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
item.creatorGNDStueve, Magnus-
item.creatorGNDZöllner, York-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.creatorOrcidStueve, Magnus-
item.creatorOrcidZöllner, York-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment Gesundheitswissenschaften-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultät Life Sciences-
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publications without full text
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenansichten

37
checked on 27.12.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe

HAW Katalog

Prüfe

Volltext ergänzen

Feedback zu diesem Datensatz


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.