DC Element | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Stueve, Magnus | |
dc.contributor.author | Zöllner, York | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-02T15:39:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-02T15:39:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-7 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0012-1797 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/4815 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) uses capillary blood glucose to measure glycemia in diabetic patients. Recently FDA-approved Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring (F-CGM) reveals glucose levels when scanned by the reading device. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have announced to reimburse F-CGM at the same level as CGM devices. Aim: This analysis’ objective was to quantify the CMS budget impact (BI) of F-CGM reimbursement in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on intensified insulin therapy (IIT), and compare it to the BI of conventional SMBG via cost-related break-even metrics. These were chosen because - in the absence of RCT-based, primary endpoint-driven clinical superiority evidence of F-CGM over SMBG for this population (REPLACE study) - they are well-suited to inform budget allocation decisions. Methods: An economic model was developed in Excel. CMS reimbursement/patient co-insurance levels for SMBG and F-CGM were used; data on morbidity, treatment and usage patterns were sourced from the literature and official websites. Different scenarios were simulated to elicit break-even points between F-CGM and SMBG. Results: The annual cost of SMBG with 3.7 tests per day (see REPLACE) is $180 per patient, compared to $2,156 incurred per F-CGM patient, representing a cost difference of $1,976/year or $5.41/day. This implies a budget break-even ratio of 1:12 patients (F-CGM:SMBG). Both technologies would break even at a consumption of 44 test strips per day. A year’s SMBG budget would last only 30 days if spent on F-CGM. Conclusion: With diabetes budgets under pressure, thoughtful spending policies are needed. It is recommended to analyze in detail which T2DM subgroups will benefit most from F-CGM, focusing reimbursement to the latter. SMBG, being an established technology, represents - at current reimbursement levels - an attractive spending option to budget holders. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Diabetes : the journal of the American Diabetes Association | |
dc.title | Budget Impact Analysis of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose vs. Flash-Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Intensive Insulin Users with Diabetes Type 2 Covered by Medicare and Medicaid | |
dc.type | Article | |
tuhh.container.endpage | LB | |
tuhh.container.issue | Suppl. 1 | |
tuhh.container.startpage | 142 | |
tuhh.container.volume | 67 | |
tuhh.oai.show | true | en_US |
tuhh.publication.institute | Department Gesundheitswissenschaften | |
tuhh.publication.institute | Fakultät Life Sciences | |
tuhh.publisher.doi | 10.2337/db18-142-LB | - |
tuhh.type.opus | (wissenschaftlicher) Artikel | - |
dc.type.casrai | Journal Article | - |
dc.type.dini | article | - |
dc.type.driver | article | - |
dcterms.DCMIType | Text | - |
item.creatorGND | Stueve, Magnus | - |
item.creatorGND | Zöllner, York | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.creatorOrcid | Stueve, Magnus | - |
item.creatorOrcid | Zöllner, York | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department Gesundheitswissenschaften | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Fakultät Life Sciences | - |
Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publications without full text |
Volltext ergänzen
Feedback zu diesem Datensatz
Export
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.