Publisher DOI: | 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.001 | Title: | Climate change policies and agendas : facing implementation challenges and guiding responses | Language: | English | Authors: | Alves, Fatima Leal Filho, Walter Casaleiro, Paula Nagy, Gustavo J. Diaz, Harry Quasem Al-Amin, Abul Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, José Baltazar Hurlbert, Margot Farooq, Harith Klavins, Maris Saroar, Mustafa Krkoska Lorencova, Eliska Jain, Suresh Soares, Amadeu Morgado, Fernando O’Hare, Paul Wolf, Franziska Azeiteiro, Ulisses Miranda |
Keywords: | Climate change; Climate change adaptation policies; National adaptation plans; Global/Local vulnerabilities | Issue Date: | Feb-2020 | Publisher: | Elsevier | Journal or Series Name: | Environmental Science & Policy | Volume: | 104 | Startpage: | 190 | Endpage: | 198 | Abstract: | Climate policies are essential to mitigate climate change and to develop successful adaptation processes. However, there is a paucity of international studies that analyse the status of climate change policies. This paper reports on research undertaken in a sample of 13 highly diverse countries, in regards to their geography, socioeconomic development, vulnerability elements, adaptation, and climate-risks. The results draw attention to the global spread and standardisation of climate change policies, namely through the adoption of comprehensive National Adaptation Plans/Strategies (NAPs/NASs) that include mitigation measures and evaluation mechanisms. Although NAPs tend to take into account different non-governmental stakeholders, they are still mainly state-centred (i.e. their steering and implementation are the responsibility of each country´s Ministry of the Environment) in most of the 13 countries in which this study was carried out. The results show that NAPs’ objectives mainly reflect more a global agenda and pay less attention to national/regional vulnerabilities and contexts. In fact, despite different socioeconomic levels of development, diverse climate-risks, and dissimilar vulnerability and readiness status among countries, the examined NAPs tend to focus on the same critical sectors and objectives. Notwithstanding their similarities, our results highlight two different logics of adaptation reflected on the NAPs: one focused on economic risks and opportunities, characteristic of developed countries; and others focused on natural resources and conservation, characteristic of developing countries. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/5033 | ISSN: | 1462-9011 | Review status: | This version was peer reviewed (peer review) | Institute: | Department Gesundheitswissenschaften Fakultät Life Sciences |
Type: | Article |
Appears in Collections: | Publications without full text |
Show full item record
Add Files to Item
Note about this record
Export
Items in REPOSIT are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.