Publisher DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.001
Title: Climate change policies and agendas : facing implementation challenges and guiding responses
Language: English
Authors: Alves, Fatima 
Leal Filho, Walter  
Casaleiro, Paula 
Nagy, Gustavo J. 
Diaz, Harry 
Quasem Al-Amin, Abul 
Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra, José Baltazar 
Hurlbert, Margot 
Farooq, Harith 
Klavins, Maris 
Saroar, Mustafa 
Krkoska Lorencova, Eliska 
Jain, Suresh 
Soares, Amadeu 
Morgado, Fernando 
O’Hare, Paul 
Wolf, Franziska  
Azeiteiro, Ulisses Miranda 
Keywords: Climate change; Climate change adaptation policies; National adaptation plans; Global/Local vulnerabilities
Issue Date: Feb-2020
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal or Series Name: Environmental Science & Policy 
Volume: 104
Startpage: 190
Endpage: 198
Abstract: 
Climate policies are essential to mitigate climate change and to develop successful adaptation processes. However, there is a paucity of international studies that analyse the status of climate change policies. This paper reports on research undertaken in a sample of 13 highly diverse countries, in regards to their geography, socioeconomic development, vulnerability elements, adaptation, and climate-risks. The results draw attention to the global spread and standardisation of climate change policies, namely through the adoption of comprehensive National Adaptation Plans/Strategies (NAPs/NASs) that include mitigation measures and evaluation mechanisms. Although NAPs tend to take into account different non-governmental stakeholders, they are still mainly state-centred (i.e. their steering and implementation are the responsibility of each country´s Ministry of the Environment) in most of the 13 countries in which this study was carried out. The results show that NAPs’ objectives mainly reflect more a global agenda and pay less attention to national/regional vulnerabilities and contexts. In fact, despite different socioeconomic levels of development, diverse climate-risks, and dissimilar vulnerability and readiness status among countries, the examined NAPs tend to focus on the same critical sectors and objectives. Notwithstanding their similarities, our results highlight two different logics of adaptation reflected on the NAPs: one focused on economic risks and opportunities, characteristic of developed countries; and others focused on natural resources and conservation, characteristic of developing countries.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/5033
ISSN: 1462-9011
Review status: This version was peer reviewed (peer review)
Institute: Department Gesundheitswissenschaften 
Fakultät Life Sciences 
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Publications without full text

Show full item record

Page view(s)

65
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record


Items in REPOSIT are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.