Fulltext available Open Access
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorReintjes, Ralf-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Quang Vinh
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T12:29:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-29T12:29:05Z-
dc.date.created2013
dc.date.issued2014-04-17
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/6533-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Countries in Western and Northern Europe are categorized as low prevalence countries with hepatitis B. However the problems with hepatitis B infection are increasingly recognized, especially among distinct groups of adults. For instance, new infections are concentrated in injecting drug users, inmates, and immigrants from high endemic regions. Vaccination is the best way to prevent hepatitis B infection and its consequences. At-risk adults are recommended to receive this vaccination. This study aims to analyze the current vaccination practices (regarding provision, copayment, and responsibility) for various groups of at-risk individuals in six European countries: the United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, Hungary, Italy and Spain. Methods: Online questionnaires were carried out in the six countries. In total 1181 experts from six different health professions (public health professionals, general practitioners, sexual health service providers, health specialists, antennal care providers and asylum seeker care providers) were invited to participate. The collected data was analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 21 software. Results: The surveys were completed by 286 respondents. In general, the vaccination practices for at-risk individuals greatly vary among the countries. And, within the country, the practices greatly differ between health professionals. Generally, the majority of the respondents in most of the countries stated that hepatitis B vaccination is either being given commonly or sometimes and free of charge to prioritized at-risk groups (such as IDUs, sex workers, MSM, HIV positive patients, and contacts of positive hepatitis B patients). There were considerable matches between the current practices and the current national polices (guidelines or recommendations) for some at-risk groups in some countries. However, to some degree, gaps between the practices and the policies for certain at-risk groups in some countries were observed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/-
dc.subject.ddc610 Medizin, Gesundheit
dc.titleHepatitis B Vaccination Practices among At-Risk Adults in Six European Countriesen
dc.typeThesis
openaire.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
thesis.grantor.departmentDepartment Gesundheitswissenschaften
thesis.grantor.placeHamburg
thesis.grantor.universityOrInstitutionHochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg
tuhh.contributor.refereeAhmad, Amena Almes-
tuhh.gvk.ppn783266413
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-reposit-65355-
tuhh.note.externpubl-mit-pod
tuhh.note.intern1
tuhh.oai.showtrueen_US
tuhh.opus.id2491
tuhh.publication.instituteDepartment Gesundheitswissenschaften
tuhh.type.opusMasterarbeit-
dc.subject.gndHepatitis B
dc.subject.gndEuropa
dc.type.casraiSupervised Student Publication-
dc.type.dinimasterThesis-
dc.type.drivermasterThesis-
dc.type.statusinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.thesismasterThesis
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.dnb.statusdomain-
item.creatorGNDNguyen, Quang Vinh-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.creatorOrcidNguyen, Quang Vinh-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.advisorGNDReintjes, Ralf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypeThesis-
Appears in Collections:Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
MA_Quang_Vinh_Nguyen.pdf2.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

305
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


Items in REPOSIT are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.