Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.48441/4427.2221
Publisher DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314679
Title: Advancing bat monitoring : assessing the impact of unmanned aerial systems on bat activity
Language: English
Authors: Roswag, Marc 
Roswag, Anna 
Roswag, Matthias Sebastian 
Fietz, Joanna 
Taefi, Tessa Touridocht  
Editor: Khan, Zeashan Hameed 
Keywords: Bats; Unmanned Aerial Systems; Drones; Wind Energy; Sustainability; Biodiversity
Issue Date: 22-Jan-2025
Publisher: PLOS
Journal or Series Name: PLOS ONE 
Volume: 20
Issue: 1
Is supplemented by: 10.48441/41201.1908
Project: Mobile Erfassung von Fledermäusen bei On-Shore Windenergieanlagen durch autonome Messdrohnen - Teilvorhaben: FriendlyDrone 
Abstract: 
With the increasing height and rotor diameter of wind turbines, bat activity monitoring within the risk area becomes more challenging. This study investigates the impact of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) on bat activity and explores acoustic bat detection via UAS as a new data collection method in the vicinity of wind turbines. We tested two types of UAS, a multicopter and a Lighter Than Air (LTA) UAS, to understand how they may affect acoustically recorded and analyzed bat activity level for three echolocation groups: Pipistrelloid, Myotini, and Nyctaloid. We hypothesized (i) that the LTA UAS will not affect bat activity levels while a multicopter, due to higher noise emission, might have a negative impact. Our results support this hypothesis, because multicopter flights have a highly significant negative impact on bat activity levels with a medium effect size, particularly for the Myotini (P < 0.001, dm = 0.54) and Nyctaloid group (P < 0.001, dn = 0.55) and a small effect size for the Pipistrelloid group (P < 0.001, dp = 0.36). In contrast, the LTA UAS had no significant effect on bat activity for each echolocation group (P > 0.05 for each group), suggesting its suitability for non-intrusive acoustic monitoring. Furthermore, we hypothesized (ii) that larger UAS propellers prevent the deterrent effect on bats. However, despite the use of larger propellers for the multicopter UAS compared to previous studies, we observed a deterrence effect for all echolocation groups. Additionally, we hypothesized that (iii) any initial deterrence or attraction effect might decrease over time. Our results did not support this hypothesis because we did not observe any habituation of bats to UAS within the 15-minute flight period. Our study highlights the potential of UAS for bat monitoring but underscores the critical importance of selecting appropriate UAS types and operating noise levels for successful surveillance efforts
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/16873
DOI: 10.48441/4427.2221
ISSN: 1932-6203
Review status: This version was peer reviewed (peer review)
Institute: Competence Center Erneuerbare Energien und Energieeffizienz 
Department Medientechnik 
Fakultät Design, Medien und Information 
Type: Article
Additional note: Roswag M, Roswag A, Roswag MS, Fietz J, Taefi TT (2025) Advancing bat monitoring: Assessing the impact of unmanned aerial systems on bat activity. PLoS ONE 20(1): e0314679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314679
Funded by: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz 
Appears in Collections:Publications with full text

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
RoswagTaefiEtAl_AdvancingBatMonitoring_PLOSOne.pdfPaper1.53 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

11
checked on Feb 19, 2025

Download(s)

4
checked on Feb 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

HAW Katalog

Check

Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons