Verlagslink: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18302-aero2021-12-06.014
https://n2t.net/ark:/13960/s221t8xjnwg
Verlagslink DOI: 10.15488/19167
Titel: Direct operating Costs, fuel consumption, and layout of the Airbus A321LR
Sprache: Englisch
Autorenschaft: Fonseca, Diego 
Schlagwörter: Luftfahrt; Passagierflugzeug; Airbus; Airbus 320; Luftfahrzeug; Kraftstoffverbrauch; Luftverschmutzung; Emission; Abgasemission; Kohlendioxidemission; Stickstoffoxide; Kondensstreifen; Umweltbilanz; Ökolabel; Flugzeugkabine; Betriebskosten; Kraftstofftank; CO2; NOX; Reichweite; Langstrecke; aeronautics; airplanes; aircraft; fuel; consumption; product; life cycle; environment; air; pollution; global warming; climatic changes; carbon dioxide; nitrogen oxides; cabins; cost of operation; fuel tanks; range; long-range
Erscheinungsdatum: 23-Jun-2025
Wird ergänzt von: 10.7910/DVN/0QHDME
Zusammenfassung: 
Purpose – Assessment of the Direct Operating Costs (DOC) and fuel consumption of the Airbus A321LR using typical use-cases and comparison with those from similar aircraft. Investigation of the flexibility of the cabin layout using examples from different airlines. Calculation of Ecolabels based on different cabin configurations. --- Methodology – All aircraft-related data is retrieved from the Original Equipment Manufacturers' (OEM) manuals. The DOC assessment uses the Association of European Airlines (AEA) and the TU Berlin method. The fuel consumption is assessed with a tool based on the Breguet Range equation, using successive iterations. The Ecolabel considers resource depletion, global warming, local air quality, and noise pollution, weighted and combined into one overall rating. A cabin study contrast layouts from Airbus with those from operators and also considering ergonomics. --- Findings – The A321LR offers improvements in flight range compared to A321CEO and A321NEO. It can operate medium range very efficiently with only minor payload reduction. Very low-density layouts of a few airlines are purely their marketing preferences. Costs per seat and Ecolabel rating vary significantly between low-density and high-density cabin configurations. Predictions for the A321XLR are also very favorable. --- Research Limitations – DOC results are not unique numbers but depend on the DOC method applied. Some of the characteristics for the XLR can so far only be estimated, since its entry into service is scheduled for 2023 and, as such, after the submission of this thesis. --- Practical Implications – Good reasons for operating the A321LR are elaborated. The Ecolabel allows passengers and operators to openly discuss the ecological implications of different cabin layouts. --- Originality – This seems to be the first scientific report that extensively investigates economic and ecologic aspects when operating the A321LR with different cabin layouts.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12738/17763
Einrichtung: Forschungsgruppe Flugzeugentwurf und -systeme (AERO) 
Department Fahrzeugtechnik und Flugzeugbau 
Fakultät Technik und Informatik 
Dokumenttyp: Abschlussarbeit
Abschlussarbeitentyp: Bachelorarbeit
Hauptgutachter*in: Scholz, Dieter  
Gutachter*in der Arbeit: Konieczny, Gordon 
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Theses

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat
TextFonseca.pdf7.9 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen
Zur Langanzeige

Seitenansichten

45
checked on 30.07.2025

Download(s)

37
checked on 30.07.2025

Google ScholarTM

Prüfe

HAW Katalog

Prüfe

Feedback zu diesem Datensatz


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons